- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 856
- Reaction score
- 1,002
- Points
- 93
I apologize in advance for another Pat*s thread but I didn't want this to be buried in the 30 pages of the other thread.
http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.co...iots-mysteriously-became-fumble-proof-in-2007
In essence, this article illustrates that prior to Brady's lobbying for the ball rule change in 2006, the Pat*s were middle of the road when it came to fumbles per touch vs. the rest of non-dome teams. Post rule change, they became an extreme outlier in having the least amount of fumbles per touch BY FAR every year following 2006 (except for 2013 but that is explained). For the naysayer's, he even posts his Excel Spreadsheet at the bottom so anyone can verify the data.
Bring out the scientists to explain this one.
http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.co...iots-mysteriously-became-fumble-proof-in-2007
In essence, this article illustrates that prior to Brady's lobbying for the ball rule change in 2006, the Pat*s were middle of the road when it came to fumbles per touch vs. the rest of non-dome teams. Post rule change, they became an extreme outlier in having the least amount of fumbles per touch BY FAR every year following 2006 (except for 2013 but that is explained). For the naysayer's, he even posts his Excel Spreadsheet at the bottom so anyone can verify the data.
Bring out the scientists to explain this one.
Last edited: