That's the jist of it. What is better? And where? And who do we NOT have because of chasing his replacement?
Look, I'm no apologist for Tombert. They could have done better, particularly 2008-2012. They still COULD do better. I think they are overly conservative at times both in free agency, roster adjustments and the draft but that is me. It's hard to argue with 10-6 (which is what Tomlin really is). Always will be in an NFL environment when there are so many **** ups and regime changes seemingly chasing championships or bust (with the busts much more prevalent). 10-6 is good. Gives the fans just enough hope for a run. Makes the playoffs more often than not. Has some stars and sells jerseys. Sells out the stadium. All good stuff.
Which is why arguing against it is hard (if not impossible). Even criticizing it is hard. People/fans don't understand. But for those that really watch year-in, year-out decisions, there is some legitimate criticism. I just think in my heart that our franchise quarterback has deodorized the stinky moves this franchise GM/Coach have made over the years. But that is a fact for almost every GM with a great QB. I think Polian gets more credit than he deserves. Some of Belichicks drafts have been horrid.
I think after all these years I've decided it's more luck than skill than everyone wants you to believe. And most are a long way away from even being the best possible.
Mitchell is okay. He was a good signing (most here wanted him and liked him, even at a bit more money than we thought). He's stayed healthy. He has worked hard, epitomized the "Steeler Way" and been a decent leader during a tough defensive transition (coordinator and lots or starters).
Hard to criticize that too much.
