• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Jets Have 1 road win all year

bigben

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
1,520
Reaction score
1,214
Points
113
They already lost to the Bills, The pressure is on they are on the road against a good defense, Against a coach who knows them inside and out. They are a fraud with the luxury of the third easiest strength of schedule. They played the AFC south and the NFC east. They are playing in the cold with snow showers in the forecast.
I know I'm reaching but its all we got? Go REX!
 
Looks to me like they have 4 road wins... not against any good teams but 4 wins.
 
I'm hoping for some lake effect snow up there and just crush that place with snow.. that should give Bills a solid chance.
 
sounds like the Bills will be without their two starting CB's.
 
Charles Clay to the IR, that's one of their best weapons they wont.
 
And they won in week 16 when the had to against a team better than them...unlike a certain other team...with 4 weeks left I figured each of us would lose 1 game..We did...they haven't and they probably won't as it should be, i still maintain any team that loses to the Ravens in that spot ..has no damn biz in the playoffs...the Jets have taken care of biz...we did not
 
And they won in week 16 when the had to against a team better than them...unlike a certain other team...with 4 weeks left I figured each of us would lose 1 game..We did...they haven't and they probably won't as it should be, i still maintain any team that loses to the Ravens in that spot ..has no damn biz in the playoffs...the Jets have taken care of biz...we did not

The pats gave them that game,intentionally lost, with the coin flip BS. I agree we don't have any business going to the playoffs, but when it comes down to it I would rather see the Steelers go than the Jets. we could lose to anybody just like on the right day we could beat anybody.
 
The pats gave them that game,intentionally lost, with the coin flip BS. I agree we don't have any business going to the playoffs, but when it comes down to it I would rather see the Steelers go than the Jets. we could lose to anybody just like on the right day we could beat anybody.

This is dumb. There is no incentive for the Patriots to want to lose that game.
 
The Pats had homefield through out on the line didn't they? Why would they lose on purpose? You really think Tom Brady wouldn't love to see our defense instead of the Chiefs or Jets?
 
I'm conflicted on this. It's not conspiracy, it's coaching.

One one hand, I think it's completely against the cheaters nature to allow themselves to lose - ever. On the other hand, look at the AFC playoff field. The Steelers are the only team that poses a significant threat in terms of a decent offense. If the coach doesn't **** things up, the team can be dangerous. On the other hand, the Steelers are obviously just as likely to goat **** the football.

It's entirely possible that Hoodie knows that in this AFC playoff field he knows that the 2nd seed is completely good enough for homefield throughout as it's unlikely that the #1 seed can even beat a team coming to visit. Honestly. I wouldn't even have to mark that up to conspiracy, that's just killing a potential threat before they become one. Yes, the Steelers defense is God-Awful. But that's largely because they're coached by some guys who utterly refuse to play aggressive defense and challenge QBs. For all his talk about not living in his fears, Butler et al **** in their pants alot. At least that's my take on what happens with those soft zones and 2 deep coverages. How you let a guy who's played for a team for 2 ******* weeks surgically slice you apart is completely beyond me. This isn't about an evolving NFL. This is about fear. Let the ****** go deep on you once or twice, but you hit him 10 times while he's trying to do it.

Anyway, I digress.
 
Read off a website the last time the Steelers got in the playoffs on the last day with a win and help scenario was 1993.
The last 4 or 5 times we didn't get the right things to happen even though we won.
 
Saying the pats****** threw that game makes no sense. They had home field sowed up and even scored to send the game into over time. They also lost one of their OL during the game. Anybody really think they wanted to play one extra game as banged up as they've been all year? And if they lose at Miami and Denver and the bungles win that means they are the 3rd seed having to host a wild card game. It makes no sense when you look at the context of why they were supposedly doing it... to keep a team they've *** raped almost every time they've played them from making the playoffs and playing them sometimes in the playoffs even though they haven't won a playoff game in 5 years.

It's farcical on it's face and makes no sense. Beilicheat kicked off in 2013 against Denver in the playoffs. Did he want to lose that game as well?
 
I don't count beating the Giants at home a road win

Yeah, but you should count beating the Colts, Dolphins, and Cowboys on the road which they did.

The pats gave them that game,intentionally lost, with the coin flip BS.

I've heard that many times. And while I love a good conspiracy when it comes to the Cheats, my only question is this. Why would they bother to tie the game and get to OT in the first place if their intention was always to lose? Why risk more playing time and more potential injuries?
 
Why would they bother to tie the game and get to OT in the first place if their intention was always to lose? Why risk more playing time and more potential injuries?
A fine point.

My only question is, who's game ended first? Did the get into overtime AFTER the Steelers had already lost? or before?

Because if the Steelers were looking like they might win the game or were in a position to win the game, it's in the cheaters best interest to keep it "interesting" as the saying goes. Essentially, aside from the injuries, which are a great risk, admittedly, they had nothing to lose.

Again, I'm not saying conspiracy, I'm saying coaching. While the Steelers defense is about the most schizophrenic thing the NFL has seen in years excepting perhaps the Colts defense back when Peyton actually won the darn thing, the offense is admittedly a great threat to any team in the playoffs. It's ultimately in EVERY teams best interest to put a wild dog down before it can bite you. And the Steelers are a very wild and unpredictable dog.
 
Last edited:
The pats gave them that game,intentionally lost, with the coin flip BS. I agree we don't have any business going to the playoffs, but when it comes down to it I would rather see the Steelers go than the Jets. we could lose to anybody just like on the right day we could beat anybody.

thats crap and doesn't change anything could care less about the coin flip
 
A fine point.

My only question is, who's game ended first? Did the get into overtime AFTER the Steelers had already lost? or before?

Because if the Steelers were looking like they might win the game or were in a position to win the game, it's in the cheaters best interest to keep it "interesting" as the saying goes. Essentially, aside from the injuries, which are a great risk, admittedly, they had nothing to lose.

Again, I'm not saying conspiracy, I'm saying coaching. While the Steelers defense is about the most schizophrenic thing the NFL has seen in years excepting perhaps the Colts defense back when Peyton actually won the darn thing, the offense is admittedly a great threat to any team in the playoffs. It's ultimately in EVERY teams best interest to put a wild dog down before it can bite you. And the Steelers are a very wild and unpredictable dog.

They had a lot to lose. They could lose home field throughout and even have to host a wildcard game. That's a lot to lose for the grand reward of not having to play a team you've ***** slapped for a decade. Let me ask this... what's the gain? Now they are forced to win Sunday. Instead of resting players they must win to keep HF. Also if anybody bothered to watch the game the Jets were playing well. The idea that NE just could have won at any time is just nuts. That would mean the pats***** knew the entire game that they were going to keep it close. Makes no sense at all.
 
Here's why I think the Pats did indeed throw away that game. By the time they got to ot...they showed the Steelers/Ravens score.........then he wins the toss but opts to kick? When you have Tom Brady? Really?


Thats why I know they threw the game away....no way he should kick with a qb like Brady.......history has shown he always takes the ball.....what was different now?

He wants the jets in Foxboro not steelers. That is a fact.
 
Here's why I think the Pats did indeed throw away that game. By the time they got to ot...they showed the Steelers/Ravens score.........then he wins the toss but opts to kick? When you have Tom Brady? Really?


Thats why I know they threw the game away....no way he should kick with a qb like Brady.......history has shown he always takes the ball.....what was different now?

He wants the jets in Foxboro not steelers. That is a fact.

Then why did he do the same thing to the Broncos just 2 years ago? Did he want to lose that game as well? It's just makes no sense. That's a fact.
 
A fine point.

My only question is, who's game ended first? Did the get into overtime AFTER the Steelers had already lost? or before?

Because if the Steelers were looking like they might win the game or were in a position to win the game, it's in the cheaters best interest to keep it "interesting" as the saying goes. Essentially, aside from the injuries, which are a great risk, admittedly, they had nothing to lose.

Again, I'm not saying conspiracy, I'm saying coaching. While the Steelers defense is about the most schizophrenic thing the NFL has seen in years excepting perhaps the Colts defense back when Peyton actually won the darn thing, the offense is admittedly a great threat to any team in the playoffs. It's ultimately in EVERY teams best interest to put a wild dog down before it can bite you. And the Steelers are a very wild and unpredictable dog.

I don't know exactly what the time the Steelers game ended. But I do know that the Pats* tied up their game while the Steelers were losing by 3.
 
Last edited:
Then why did he do the same thing to the Broncos just 2 years ago? Did he want to lose that game as well? It's just makes no sense. That's a fact.

Don't know the circumstances surrounding that time. Could have been a motive for it or perhaps the D was on fire that day? Did they not lose that one also? Makes it even more suspect if that's the case.

This time it was a bit on the suspicious side at the very least and made no sense otherwise.
 
Top