They intentionally left out National championships to skewer their alma matters numbers higher... lol...
not a bad list but flawed... winning percentage and wins are very close so its like they doubled that up, which i am ok with... the article even stated they didn’t go as deep as they could have...
Usually when someone puts this amont of work in but doesn’t go truly all out And leaves out the obvious things like NC, they are trying to skewer something up a bit... still really interesting
Things like conference titles penalizes teams that were independent for a long period of time..
doesn’t take into account strength of opponents... like i said... its flawed but interesting