• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Two plays...

If the defender was grabbing the back of the helmet that’s not a facemask penalty.

Because the facemask is on the front of the helmet, covering the, uh you know…face.

OK. Good talk.
You blow quite a bit of wind and it's starting to stink.

Since you're in need of education...

The NFL face mask rule prohibits players from grasping, twisting, turning, pushing, or pulling an opponent's face mask or helmet opening. The penalty is a 15-yard loss, and the action can result in disqualification if it is considered flagrant. Incidental contact is no longer penalized with a 5-yard penalty; it is either not called or is considered a flagrant foul.
Key aspects of the rule

• What is prohibited: Players are not allowed to grasp and then twist, turn, push, or pull an opponent's face mask or helmet opening.
• Intentional vs. incidental: The rule was changed to eliminate the 5-yard penalty for incidental or accidental contact. If a player grasps a mask, they must release it immediately. If they control their opponent with the mask, it's a foul.
• Penalty:

• 15-yard penalty: For a facemask foul, the penalty is 15 yards.
• Automatic first down: If the defense commits the foul, it results in an automatic first down for the offense.
• Disqualification: A player may be disqualified if the action is deemed flagrant.

• Examples of a foul:

• A pass rusher grazing the quarterback's face mask while trying to disrupt a pass.
• A defender contacting a ball carrier's face mask to make a tackle.
• An offensive lineman using their hand to forcefully contact the face mask of a defensive lineman during blocking.

• Reviewability: The league is considering making facemask penalties subject to replay assistance, which would be a change from the current precedent where a penalty is not called if not seen by an official on the field.

The back of the helmet and ANY opening (face mask included) falls under the rules.

Has the picture been painted clearly enough for you now, Sparky???
 
Two plays from today's game can define the last (insert random timeline under Tomlin here) years for Mike Tomlin. Second quarter, Bears ball, 3rd and 5 from Chicago's 41 yard line, 47 seconds left. Get a stop here and the Bears don't get points before the half. Instead, the Defense lines up with the entire secondary 10-15 yards off the LOS. Easy pitch and catch for 10 yards and a Bears first down...

Second play, again it's the Bears ball, 3rd and goal on the one yard line. Bears lead by 3, VERY important down. Bears line up in shotgun formation, but again, they are on the ONE YARD LINE. We have TWO DL, which BOTH get double teamed. By the time the Linebackers even have time to react, all five Bears offensive linemen are in the endzone with the RB walking in easily.

Absolutely pathetic. It's not the players, it's not the talent, it's 100% the scheme. Both offensive and defensively. We aren't even going to get into Warren again being out snapped by Gainwell, or all the 3rd and long plays where we run short of the sticks and HOPE for a missed tackle. This game here, this specific game is the one this year that pissed me off the most.

Second week in a row the opposing teams defense is missing SEVERAL starters, and we can't move the ball. How do you not exploit the middle of the field. That's what Chicago did. They killed us on slants today. I didn't see one single slant from us at all today. Fire everyone, trade everyone, start from complete scratch...
As you said, 3rd n long and run a play short (well short most times) of the sticks, but on 2nd or 3rd n 1, run a long, low percentage go ball to a WR that has no ability to win theoretical 50/50 ball, nor the foresight to know that, by ball placement, he is now essentially the DB and needs to break up the pass. Can’t execute the tush push, can’t make a defensive stop after a turnover… can go on and on. Pathetic
 
you neglected to include one play, @insaniti
that being an offensive play, one where we dictate what can or should happen.

from ESPN
0-yd Run
8:55 - 2nd
Direct snap to Co.Heyward. Co.Heyward up the middle to CHI 30 for no gain (A.Ogbongbemiga; N.Wright).
4th & 1 at CHI 30

if you recall this play, and you do, you'll note that we had Gainwell to Heyward's left with Mt Washington behind Heyward.

and who was behind Washington, a good 5 yards away? The fleet footed Rudolph, there to act as some sort of defensive safety in the event of a fumble or botched snap.

which, realistically, hamstrung the offense on that play. Rudolph was a complete non-participant and made that a 10-on-11 play.

Additionally, it may have been more ideal to have Washington take the snap with more beef behind him in the form of Black and Benton. In that situation, there's no technical know-how involved. Simply push forward. Inserting Gainwell did benefit on the second instance of that situation, but putting a large pile of men into the middle with the largest and strongest... probably could have gotten that yard.

or - and this is a bit of an odd line of thinking... why not inject our MVP to kick essentially a gimme FG and push our lead to 10?

11 plays and 70 yards later, the Bears tied the game. I'm sure that's just coincidental.
 
I just read a stat that might change everything.
Did you know .Mike Tomlin has never had a losing season? Yay.
Yep even the joke about the joke is getting old

Wait, Mike Tomlin has never had a losing seasons?!?!?

Ho-lee sheeetz, that changes everything!
 
They need 3 more wins, where are they going to come from?

ad2w9u.jpg
 
What's worse is 90% of their receiving options are TEs or slot receivers who should thrive over the middle when the other team is missing 3 LBs.
Everything was there for the taking and they still managed to not attack their glaring weaknesses.

It was beyond pathetic…
 
Top