This is such a money post here. Coaching is one part dealing with the people and motivating, one part teaching and one part strategy. Despite what has happened, I believe that Tomlin handles the players well and most want to play for him. Teaching and Strategy?? Belichek's teams frequently look like **** in the first 4 games, but manage at least 2 wins. The team that starts the season is unrecognizable to the team that ends it. Why? Cause they teach over there. Tomlin can only fix a problem with an influx of talent. He cannot teach or scheme his way out.
I always liked Emperor Chaz's mentality when it came to teaching vs motivating.
If the head coach is forced to motivate you to play football, get the will to win, and play at 100% each and every snap, that player is in the wrong line of business and should move on with his life's work.
Not saying a coach can't motivate.
But a coach's primary responsibility is teaching and ensuring the players are learning and absorbing what he is teaching, as well as adapting to the different challenges/looks different teams throw at you week in and week out.
My fear is Tomlin is not acting like a CEO overseeing his Vice Presidents ( Coordinators ), whom in turn oversee the Directors ( Positional Coaches ), but rather trying to do all the jobs of all the people.
I believe Tomlin is a phenomenal motivator. I believe he is severely deficient in X's and O's. I believe he needs to be more CEO that delegates rather than Jack-Of-All-Master-Of-None that always seems 2 steps behind in game.
Allow the Coordinators to call the plays in game and just give them direction ( we're going for it on this 4th and 2, go onsides, fake punt, etc ) and managed the totality of the team ( challenges, in game adjustments, change in scheme, go hurry up, etc ).
Our sidelines have looked disorganized and befuddled under Tomlin, especially the last couple of years.